wheat-free.org

.org

online resource for wheat free food help

Google
 
 

Tuesday, April 25. 2006

Wheat wafers and Holy Communion

If you have a wheat allergy or coeliac disease how do you cope with Holy Communion?

The Catholic doctrine believes that the wafer and wine taken at Holy Communion are the body and blood of Christ, and therein lies a major problem for someone with a wheat or gluten allergy.

How do you take part in this most important aspect of your religion if you know that the moment that you swallow the wheat containing wafer, or drink from the cup that other people have left wheat on the rim of or in the wine, you will become ill, often within seconds of contact.

How has the Catholic church considered the health aspects of forcing someone with a wheat or gluten allergy to consume that very substance that will make them ill?

Well sadly it appears that it isn't easy for sufferers to maintain their spiritual and physical health needs at the same time.

It was recently in the news that a 7 year old has been practicing to receive first Communion, however suffering from coeliac disease and diabetes means that they cannot eat the wheat wafer or drink the wine.

Having thought that using a rice Communion wafer would be the perfect solution to this, the child’s parents were disappointed to find out that official church policy forbids its use.

The ritual of Communion is tied to the Last Supper when Jesus is believed to have eaten wheat bread and drunk grape wine with his disciples. Canon law therefore requires that both wheat and wine be part of the Communion service. Children usually only eat the wafer, while adults usually receive both.

Pope Benedict XVI, in his previous role, addressed the issue of Catholic worshippers who suffer from coeliac disease and alcoholism, allowing the substitution of low gluten wafers and slightly fermented grape juice.

However with approximately 1 in 133 Americans suffering from coeliac disease (according to the Celiac Disease Foundation), and its rising prevalence in Europe and other parts of the world, some sufferers have been left high and dry by the refusal to honour their right to Communion, and in some cases declaring it invalid if rice wafers are used.

Some people are so sensitive that even low gluten wafers are unable to be tolerated by their bodies. In these cases isn’t it time that the church relaxed this overly rigid rule by special dispensation?

While staunch Catholics rigidly maintain that the wafer must be wheat, coeliac disease does exist, and is a major health issue for people who suffer from it. We are after all in the 21st Century, should the church not be updating this overly rigid issue that is causing people to look to other religions that will adapt to their health needs as well as their spiritual needs?

Allowing rice based Communion wafers would be a small but significant step for those sufferers who, through no fault of their own, have a health issue that prohibits them from being accepted fully into the religion that they choose to follow.

Posted by Helen Fletton in wheat blog at 11:17 | Comments (8) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Interestingly an article appeared in the Yorkshire Evening Post this week about a Reverend who after 10 years of illness has finally been diagnosed as a coeliac.

He has to celebrate Communion, and receive Communion himself, but being allergic to gluten means that he can no longer eat the wheat wafer.

The article says that he has special gluten free blessed biscuits shipped to his church for his use.

So if the Church of England allows him to have specially blessed gluten free biscuits for his own personal use, why is the Roman Catholic Church making such a fuss about coeliacs who need gluten free wafers, and not allowing them to take Communion if they use them, or declaring it invalid if it has already taken place?

Surely if it's acceptable for the Church of England then it should be acceptable for the Roman Catholic Church, after all don't they all ultimately have the same boss?
#1 Helen (Homepage) on 2006-05-19 14:16 (Reply)
My daughter also suffers from celiac disease and we are Catholic. She has the option of receiving only the consectrated wine (Christ's Precious Blood) or of using a low gluten host.

The Catholic church has been around for over 2000 years defending and preserving both the Word of God and the traditions that Christ handed down to the apostles and they take that role quite seriously. It is not the Church who made the choice to use wheat and grapes for this very holy sacrament, but Christ Himself.

We believe that the bread and wine become the very substance of Christ's own Body and Blood even while still maintaining the appearance of bread and wine and we believe it because Christ said it Himself at the last supper and in John chapter 6 where He commanded that "Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you do not have life within you."(Jn 6:53)

The Church does not have the authority to now change the substance of the bread or the wine that is used. The ingredients are what they have always been and to change them would be to create an invalid sacrament, meaning that transubstantiation would not occur (Christ would not become present). For a Catholic, this would make receiving communion rather pointless.

While this does create a problem for those sensitive to those substances, with a little help from the parish priest, a solution can usually be reached.
#1.1 Leann on 2006-06-23 09:35 (Reply)
"It is not the Church who made the choice to use wheat and grapes for this very holy sacrament, but Christ Himself."

Did he choose it because it has some holy quality to it, or because that was the sort of bread people had at the time? Unless you can demonstrate that the former is the case, then I suggest your point is without basis.

Additionally, did Jesus not remark with disdain on how people quabbled over the technical aspects of the Law while ignoring the more important matters of forgiveness & mercy? Should people really have to go to the hospital to partake in the most holy Rite in Catholicism? Does communion not work without Gluten in the wafers? Also, didn't the disciples eat bread, rather than wafers? If that is the case, then the whole of Catholicism's Eucharist is off the mark.

May I kindly suggest that the Eucharist is a spiritual Ritual with very profound meaning/significance which does not rely on the content of the wafer & wine, but rather that they correspond with the flesh & blood and that they are taken in Rememberence of Him. Communion is a powerful thing, and this debate debases it's holyness much more than non-gluten wafers ever could.

Thanks for reading my rant.
#1.1.1 mark (Homepage) on 2006-07-14 08:59 (Reply)
"did Jesus not remark with disdain on how people quabbled over the technical aspects of the Law"

Jesus said that it doesn't matter what goes in the mouth that counts, it's what comes out of it. So yes you are correct, just thought I would help clarify.

"transubstantiation would not occur (Christ would not become present). For a Catholic, this would make receiving communion rather pointless"

I think LifeTeen does a good job of that...Where exactly in Holy Scripture does Jesus or any of the Apostle's whip out a guitar, drums, speakers....

"Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you do not have life within you."

What about those who are recovering alcoholics? Those who are in AA and vow to never touch alcohol again...should it be forced upon them?
#1.1.1.1 Thadeus on 2006-07-17 10:15 (Reply)
Thank you for the initial clarification. I was commenting on a different verse, but the one you quoted seems especially pertinent when applied to this issue. Christ also emphasized the Spirit over Law, and I find it hard to come to the conclusion that Jesus was instuting a gluten Commandment in regards to the Eucharist.

As I stated before, they did not eat wafers, but loaves of bread as part of their passover meal. Why is there budge room on the loaves vs. wafers issue and not any budge room on gluten vs. non-gluten for alcoholics and those with wheat allergies?

Additionally, the argument that trans-substantiation will not occur without gluten seems to be missing the entire point of what it means to "eat the flesh of the Son of Man." The transformation of Bread into His Flesh is of a manner which goes well beyond the ingredients, imo. Same goes for wine/grapes transforming into His Blood. I really just don't see any scriptural support for this stance.

I don't mean to cause contention against the Catholic Church here, I just feel that some more important matters are at stake here. The Eucharist was at the center of early Christian tradition. People would meet and break bread together, discussing Jesus and his works/words. This central event of the Eucharist was highly symbolic (though not merely symbolic) as the Liturgy surrounding it attests to. And the Liturgy is not merely symbolic either. Though I am not a practicing Catholic, I have participated in a couple of Masses where I didn't even take the communion and the Liturgy itself invoked some very profound experience.

So, what exactly is the Flesh of the Son of Man? And what exactly is his Blood? In my opinion, these are more important questions to resolve.

thanks,
mark
#1.1.1.1.1 mark on 2006-07-19 11:27 (Reply)
Anyone with a bible can make an argument I guess. The point isn't what you, or I for that matter, can "kindly suggest". The point is, what is Truth?

The Catholic religion's authority and teaching comes from 3 different sources, the Bible, Apostolic Tradition, and the Magisterium. Apostolic Tradition and the Magisterium have been around 400 years longer than the New Testament. The canon of the NT was assembled and pronounced to be the inspired word of God in A.D. 397 at the council of Carthage and confirmed at a second council in 419, at which time the exact content was decided and approved to the exclusion of all others. My point in this is that taking a few verses from the Bible out of the context of history and apostolic tradition can lead us to all sorts of erroneous conclusions.

You have really good questions. So many of us seek only the answers that we want to hear. The Catholic church is not a democracy so we really cannot take a vote or a poll to figure out what it should be doing about things like celiac sufferers.

I imagine that the rigidity in the ingredients of the precious body and blood may have something also to do with curbing abuses but the bottom line is that the church acts only to preserve the faith the way that Jesus handed it down to us. You can argue how you feel about it all you want but what I wrote above is simple fact and the Catholic Church's official stand on the matter, not my point, or my opinion or the compilation of all my friends and acquaintances opinions.

My heart goes out to anyone struggling to find where they fit in with this disease. Keep digging for the answers to your questions and find out why the church teaches what it does so you can form your opinions on facts and not feelings. I hope that the answers eventually lead you back home to Rome.
#1.1.1.1.1.1 Leann on 2006-12-08 23:05 (Reply)
The Catholic eucharist is intended to be a ritual that recreates the last supper -- which was not a Passover feast, as evidenced by an enormous amount of scriptural scholarship.

The instruction on the eucharist dictates that the consecrated matter be of water and wheat only because one of the virtues of a central instruction is that it's unitive. Catholics all over the world receive the same eucharist . . . and around the world, the most commonly available materials are flour and water. So what, really, is the oppression in using the most simple ingredients available?

And receiving wine on its own, at least in the Catholic Church, is a full communion. There is no need to receive both or to receive the body of Christ.
#1.1.1.1.1.2 Kate on 2006-12-11 15:38 (Reply)
yes some wine are made with wheat try red wine is less alcohol and wheet and avoid fish with wine its give u allergy problem
#2 Jakee on 2007-06-21 00:38 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.
 
  • home
  • wheat allergy
  • gluten allergy
  • news
  • recipes
    • starters
    • main courses
    • desserts
    • cakes & cookies
    • breads
    • miscellaneous
  • wheat blog
  • health & fitness
    • autism/ADHD
    • dogs & wheat
    • weightloss
    • diet
    • food for sport
    • slug blog
  • faq
  • info centre
    • alcohol
    • chocolate
    • flour
    • food fact file
    • glossary
    • hygiene
    • product reviews
    • supplies
    • about us
    • testimonials
    • links
    • advertising
    • contact us
  • directory
  • wheat-free ebay
  • Mother's Day
  • books

Archives

May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
Recent...
Older...

Syndicate This Blog

XML RSS 0.91 feed
XML RSS 1.0 feed
XML RSS 2.0 feed
ATOM/XML ATOM 1.0 feed

Calendar

Back May '08
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
about - ©2000 – 2005 Helen Fletton - disclaimer - site map - links